(PC) Mundy v. Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STANLEY W. MUNDY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00401-KES-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL (Docs. 39, 49) STAFF, et al., 14 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff Stanley Mundy is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 24, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the action proceed on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim regarding the failure to provide plaintiff a medically required non-soy diet at CDCR, against defendant Jeff Macomber, in his official capacity, and on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against defendants Long, Pimentel, Onyeje, Logan, and Conanan. Doc. 39. It was further recommended that all other…