Cueva
(PC) Carr v. Cueva
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL DAVID CARR, No. 2:24-cv-01680 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER DANIEL E. CUEVA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. He has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action based on 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.1 On September 12, 2024, plaintiff submitted a complete copy of his signed complaint. ECF No. 10. He also filed a motion to refile his original complaint, or, in the alternative, a request for leave to amend his complaint. ECF No. 8. As explained in this court’s August 23,
This means that plaintiff is allowed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in monthly installments that are taken from the inmate’s…