(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20241:20-cv-01288California606 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01288-KES-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT

v. DEFENDANT TAYLOR’S MOTION TO

DISMISS

CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., (Doc. 118) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Diontae Johan Duncan is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. On August 9, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that defendant Taylor’s motion to dismiss be granted and that plaintiff be given leave to file a further amended complaint to cure the lack of clarity within his second amended complaint. Doc. 118. The magistrate judge advised the parties that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of his rights on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.