(PS) Nasiri v. Pfizer, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20242:24-cv-02111California1,716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZABIULLAH NASIRI, 2:24-cv-02111 KJM CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND PFIZER, INC., et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff’s pro se complaint filed on August 5, 2024, is before the court for screening.1 (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. However, the complaint fails to invoke the court’s subject matter jurisdiction and fails to state a claim. Because the complaint’s deficiencies cannot be remedied by amendment, the undersigned recommends the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. I. Allegations in the Complaint Plaintiff alleges the defendant, Pfizer, Inc., deceived the public with widespread misrepresentation that its vaccine possessed 95% efficacy against COVID-19 infections, among other information that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.