(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20241:20-cv-01288California1,810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01288-KES-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. Doc. 109 CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Diontae Johan Duncan is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion (Doc. 109) that the court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order at Doc. 80 dismissing certain claims and defendants. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 13, 2023, the court issued findings and recommendations to dismiss certain claims and defendants from plaintiff’s second amended complaint following screening. Doc. 75. The assigned magistrate judge found, in relevant part: Plaintiff’s second amended complaint names “T. Taylor” in the caption. (Doc. 52 at 1.) Subsequently, under the heading “III. Defendants” in the complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.