Murray

Murray v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20241:22-cv-01449California4,627 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Porshay Murray, No. 1:22-CV-01449-KJM-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Defendant. 16 Following settlement of her substantive claims, plaintiff Porshay Murray seeks attorneys’ 18 fees and costs from defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC., a collection agency. For the 19 reasons set forth below, plaintiff's motion is granted in part and denied in part. 20 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action alleging defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA). See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. A few months later, plaintiff accepted defendant’s offer of judgment in the amount of $2,001.00 for plaintiffs damages, and agreed that reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs would be determined later. See Notice, ECF No. 5. The court then entered judgment and ordered any motion or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.