Ruiz

Ruiz v. The City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20241:24-cv-00287California384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IGNACIO RUIZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00287-KES-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE

PROOF OF SERVICE OR STATUS REPORT

THE CITY OF FRESNO, et al., (ECF No. 13) Defendant.

DEADLINE: OCTOBER 17, 2024

16 17 On September 27, 2024, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff Ignacio Ruiz to file proof of service or a status report regarding service on Paco Balderrama, Mindy Casto, Joe Alvarez, Tom Rowe, Anthony DeWall, Sean Biggs, and Joshua Knapp. (ECF No. 13.) The Court gave Plaintiff through October 11, 2024, to file proof of service or a status report. (Id.) Plaintiff has not done so nor requested an extension of time from the Court. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.