Hill
(PC) Moore v. Hill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIDNI ALFRED MOORE, No. 2:22-cv-0758 DC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
RICK HILL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Currently before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint. ECF No. 24. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). A claim “is [legally] frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989);…