A.T.
A.T. v. City of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A.T., a minor, by and through her Guardian No. 2:24-cv-01299 DC AC Ad Litem, UNIQUIE MCCURTY, 12 Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER v.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO,
15 Defendant. 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 9), is APPROVED and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 1. Requests to seal documents shall be made by motion before the same judge who will decide the matter related to that request to seal. 2. The designation of documents (including transcripts of testimony) as confidential pursuant to this order does not automatically entitle the parties to file such a document with the court under seal. Parties are advised that any request to seal documents in this district is governed by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 141. In brief, Local Rule 141 provides that documents may only be sealed by a written order of the court after a specific request to seal has been made. Local Rule 141(a). However, a mere…