Baraona

(PC) Puckett v. Baraona

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20241:21-cv-01448California835 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01448-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMOVE

TRIAL WITNESSES AS PREMATURE

v. (ECF No. 95)

BARAONA, et al., ORDER DENYING RENEWED MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Defendants. (ECF No. 96) 16 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants A. Baraona, R. Burnitzki,1 R. Leos, H. Hernandez, and E. Diaz for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (2) Defendants R. Leos for sexual assault in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and (3) Defendants A. Ruiz, R. Martinez, E. Ruiz, G. Meier,2 R. Gutierrez, J. Cruz, K. Allison (Cronister), and T. Price for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.