Figueroa

(PC) Rabb v. Figueroa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20241:23-cv-00843California679 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAMEN D. RABB, No. 1:23-cv-00843-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTIONS CONSTRUED AS MOTION

v. FOR RECONSIDERATION ESTEVEN FIGUEROA, et al., (ECF No. 82) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 27, 2024, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to compel Plaintiff’s participation in his deposition, imposed costs, and modified the scheduling order. (ECF No. 81.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s objections to the Court’s September 27, 2024, order construed as a motion for reconsideration, filed October 15, 2024. (ECF No. 82.) I. DISCUSSION Rule 60(b) allows the Court to relieve a party from an order for “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.