Verduzco

] 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || SUSANA VERDUZCO, Case No. 2:23-CV-02269-KJM-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED y STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 32) ST. MARY’S HIGH SCHOOL, et al., I5 Defendants. 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 32), 18 || and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 21 || jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 22 || 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 ||(E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction 24 || for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case).…