Campbell

(PC) Medina v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20241:23-cv-00381California1,171 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CESARIO VIZCARRA MEDINA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00381-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS ON APPEAL BE DENIED

TAMMY CAMPBELL, (ECF No. 22). Defendant.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Cesario Vizcarra Medina is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights case filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis; rather, he paid 20 the filing fee in full. (See July 19, 2023 docket entry). 21 Plaintiff’s operative complaint alleged that his prison is denying him his constitutional 22 right to have contact visits with his minor children. The assigned District Judge dismissed the 23 case with prejudice, adopting the findings and recommendations that concluded that Plaintiff 24 failed to state a claim. (ECF Nos. 14, 17, 18). 25 Plaintiff appealed (Case No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.