Gomez

Gomez v. Ciuffini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20241:23-cv-01696California376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE GOMEZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-01696-KES-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. Docs. 1, 6 KATHY CIUFFINI,

15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Michelle Gomez, proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a complaint on 19 December 8, 2023. Doc. 1. On January 9, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings 20 and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed sua sponte without 21 leave to amend as plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrine of judicial immunity and the 22 Eleventh Amendment. Doc. 6. 23 The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that 24 objections were to be filed within twenty-one days of service. Id. at 5. Plaintiff has not filed any 25 objections, and the time to do so has expired. 26 In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court has conducted a de novo review of 27 this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court concludes the findings and 28 ||…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.