Warden

(PC) Beeson v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20242:23-cv-01621California311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAYLOR A. BEESON, No. 2:23-cv-1621 DJC CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WARDEN, F.C.I. HERLONG, Defendants. 16 On September 5, 2024, the court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant Birtwell. That thirty-day period has passed, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s copy of the September 5, 2024, order was returned by the U.S. Postal Service, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.