Vue

(PC) Adair v. Vue

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20242:24-cv-00915California281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES FRANKLIN ADAIR, No. 2:24-cv-0915 CKD P Plaintiff, v. MACNAUGHT, et al., ORDER AND Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 On September 3, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint within 30 days would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The amended complaint was due on October 5, 2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to this action; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.