Jackowitz

(PC) Hunter v. Jackowitz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20242:22-cv-01281California2,324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON EUGENE HUNTER, No. 2:22-cv-1281 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JACKOWITZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. On May 10, 2024, defendants filed three motions, including a motion to compel plaintiff to participate in a deposition. (ECF No. 31.) After the court granted two extensions of time, plaintiff’s responses to those motions were due on September 10, 2024. (ECF No. 39.) Plaintiff has not filed responses to defendants’ motions. For the reasons set forth below, this court will recommend this action be dismissed. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on July 20, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) After dismissing the original complaint for failure to state any claims under §1983, this court found plaintiff stated some cognizable claims for relief in his first amended complaint. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.