(PC) Edwards v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20242:22-cv-01854California1,304 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY D. EDWARDS, No. 2:22-cv-1854 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds plaintiff again states no claims for relief potentially cognizable under §1983. Because permitting plaintiff to file another amended complaint would be futile, the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed four prior complaints. The court screened each complaint and dismissed each with leave to amend. Plaintiff filed his original complaint on October 19, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) While portions of the complaint were not legible, on screening, the court was able to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.