Diaz

(PC) Perez v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20241:24-cv-00845California595 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 HENRY PEREZ, 1:24-cv-00845-JLT-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE HEATHER DIAZ, et al., OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, Defendants. DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 15 16 Plaintiff Henry Perez is confined at Kern County AES Center and is proceeding pro se in 17 this civil rights action. Together with his complaint, on July 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed an 18 application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2). 19 However, the IFP application is not fully completed. Specifically, the portion of the IFP form 20 requiring an officer at the place of Plaintiff’s incarceration to certify Plaintiff’s account balance 21 and to provide a certified copy of the trust account statement showing transactions for the past six 22 months, has not been completed. (Id. at 2). In addition, in the same application, Plaintiff states that he contributes $200 per month…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.