(PS) Yahne v. USA IRS

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20242:24-cv-02813California1,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT G. YAHNE, No. 2:24-cv-02813 DJC AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA;

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;

DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY

GENERAL D/B/A DAVAD A. HUBERT; and CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendants. 19 On October 15, 2024, plaintiff filed this action in pro se and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The undersigned has reviewed the complaint and believes that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s case, and that this case must be dismissed with prejudice. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377, (1994). In 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332(a), “Congress granted federal courts jurisdiction over two general types of cases: cases that “aris[e] under” federal law, § 1331,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.