Phillips

(PC) Schmaus v. Phillips

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20241:23-cv-01125California412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON ERIK SCHMAUS, Case No. 1:23-cv-1125 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS,

AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT

PHILLIPS, et al. TO UPDATE THE DOCKET Defendants. (Doc. 32) 16 Jason Erik Schmaus seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights while incarcerated at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility. (See Doc. 19.) The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), and found Plaintiff stated cognizable claims for deliberate indifference and retaliation against Dr. Aye. (Doc. 21 at 6-12.) However, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff did not state cognizable claims against the other defendants. (Id.) Plaintiff’s response to the Screening Order included a request that the action “proceed only on the deliberate indifference and retaliation claim on Dr. Aye.” 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.