Campbell
(PC) Osuna v. Campbell
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 JAMIE OSUNA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01156-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE
v. DISMISSED FOR FILING A FALSE IFP
AFFIDAVIT
T. CAMPBELL, et al.,
13 (ECF No. 2) Defendants.
RESPONSE DUE BY NO LATER THAN
NOVEMBER 18, 2024
15 16 Plaintiff Jamie Osuna is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action. (ECF No. 17 1). Plaintiff’s complaint is dated September 24, 2024 (id. at 33) and was filed on September 30, 18 2024. (See docket). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), 19 also dated September 24, 2024. (ECF No. 2). For the reasons given below, the Court will require Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for filing a false IFP affidavit. The Court normally requires a $405 filing fee for a civil action. However, a federal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, permits a plaintiff to commence a lawsuit without prepaying a filing fee. This statute requires “an affidavit that includes a statement of all…