Newsom
(PS) Ahmad v. Newsom
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NOMAN AHMAD, Case No. 2:23-cv-01378-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
GAVIN NEWSOM, LLC, et al.,
Defendants. 16 On March 29, 2024, the court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the first amended complaint and ordered plaintiff to file, within thirty days, either a second amended complaint or a notice stating his intent to not file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 41. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); see Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all…