(PC) Matthew A. Lawrie v. Christian Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20241:21-cv-00724California3,388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW A. LAWRIE, No. 1:21-cv-00724 KES GSA (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER (FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT)

v. (ECF No. 31) CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER,

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

Defendant. AN AMENDED COMPLAINT PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT

DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 19 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 Before this Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 31. For the 22 reasons stated below, Plaintiff will be given a final opportunity to file an amended complaint that 23 successfully states a cognizable claim. He will be given thirty days to do so.

I. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

25 A. Facts Alleged and Harm Caused 26 Plaintiff, currently an inmate at Mule Creek State Prison…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.