Dunn

Dunn v. HUD Urban Development

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20241:24-cv-00815California783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EMMA DUNN, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00815-KES-BAM

Plaintiffs,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. REGARDING PENDING IN FORMA

PAUPERIS APPLICATIONS

HUD URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., (Docs. 2, 5, 8) Defendants.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

On July 16, 2024, Emma Dunn, Ariel Dunn, Richie Dunn, Aaliyah Dunn, and Ashanti Dunn (“Plaintiffs”) filed the instant civil action. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff Emma Dunn also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2.) On July 22, 2024, the Court reviewed these filings, identified various deficiencies, and ordered as follows: (1) if Plaintiffs Ariel Dunn, Richie Dunn, Aaliyah Dunn, and Ashanti Dunn wish to proceed in this action along with Plaintiff Emma Dunn, then they shall file an amended complaint that includes the signatures of each plaintiff proceeding pro se; (2) if Plaintiffs Ariel Dunn, Richie Dunn, Aaliyah Dunn, and Ashanti Dunn wish to proceed in this action, then they shall file an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.