(PS) Legardy v. Taco Bell
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLETCHER LEGARDY Case No. 2:23-cv-01332-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
BE DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO
TACO BELL, AMEND Defendant. ECF No. 12 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
17 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint continues to assert vague and nonsensical claims against Taco Bell. Since the complaint has failed to cure the deficiencies identified in my earlier screening order, I now recommend that this action be dismissed without leave to amend. Screening and Pleading Requirements A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is entitled to relief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and provide “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). The plausibility standard does not 25 …