Fang

(PS) Coleman v. Fang

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20242:24-cv-02248California640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACQUELINE COLEMAN, No. 2:24-cv-02248 DAD AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS XIAOYAN FANG and YE FANG, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On August 19, 2024, on the same day she filed her complaint, plaintiff filed a motion for injunctive relief. ECF No. 3. The only information on the motion for an injunction is “SEE VAWA COMPLAINT ATTCHED HERETO AS COMPLAINT.” The complaint alleges housing discrimination related to a unit that plaintiff vacated in July of 2021. ECF No. 1 at 7-9. Attached to the complaint is a copy of a restraining order issued in 2023 against plaintiff’s ex-husband. ECF No. 1 at 13-19. “A preliminary injunction is an ‘extraordinary and drastic remedy’ ... never awarded as of right.” Munaf v. Geren, 553 U.S. 674, 689 (2008) (internal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.