(PS) Arnold v. Lion's Club International Assoc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBLY ARNOLD AND ROLAND No. 2:24-cv-02095 DAD AC (PS)
DUNHAM II,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 LIONS CLUB INT’L ASSOC., et al, 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS Plaintiff Kimbly Arnold filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Arnold’s motion to proceed IFP will therefore be granted. Plaintiff Roland Dunham has not submitted a request to proceed IFP, nor has he paid the filing fee. He will be provided additional time to do so. Mr. Dunham is advised that the complaint cannot be served on his behalf, requiring defendants to respond to his claim(s) for relief, unless he is granted leave to proceed IFP. Also, absent IFP status or payment of the filing fee, Mr. Dunham may be dismissed…