(HC) Taylor v. Superior Court of CA County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT ANTHONY TAYLOR, No. 2:24-cv-02271-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER AND SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SACRMENTO,

15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his hit and run conviction from the Sacramento County Superior Court. Court records reveal that petitioner is challenging this same conviction in Taylor v. District Attorney, No. 2:24-cv-01400-DJC-SCR.1 Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. Federal courts retain broad powers to control their dockets and to “prevent duplicative or unnecessary litigation.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 478 (2000). The court has conducted its preliminary review of the…