CDCR

(PC) Dixon v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20241:24-cv-00954California548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DELSHON DIXON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00954-KES-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v.

CERTAIN PARTIES

CDCR, et al., (Doc. 12) Defendants.

17 18 Plaintiff Delshon Dixon is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma paupers in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. On August 21, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order finding plaintiff’s complaint plausibly alleges Eighth Amendment claims for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against defendants Thompson and Dewitt but fails to allege cognizable claims against defendants CDCR and Warden Pfeiffer. Doc. 7 at 10. Plaintiff was ordered, within 30 days of the date of service of the screening order, to either: (1) file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the screening order; or (2) notify the court in writing that he does not wish to file an amended 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.