Davies

(PC) Morgan v. Davies

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20242:24-cv-00480California602 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKE MORGAN, No. 2:24-CV-0480-DAD-CKD-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS D. DAVIES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I. Screening Requirement Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint that is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Examination of the first amended complaint and court records reveal that it contains virtually identical allegations as those raised in Morgan v. Espinoza, et al., No. 2:23-cv- 1955-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal.).1 Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, the undersigned recommends that it be

The Court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.