Powell

Powell v. Segerstrom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20241:24-cv-00969California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHANNON R. POWELL, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0969 JLT SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING ) THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE THE UNITED STATES, et al., ) ) (Doc. 4) Defendants. ) ) )

Shannon R. Powell is proceeding pro se in this action against the following defendants: The United States, Tuolumne County Judge Donald Segerstrom, Governor Gavin Newsom, Vice President Kamala Harris, Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, “Ex-Governor” Edward Brown, “The Federal Judicial Judges,” Federal Bureau of Investigation, and “U.S. Marshals.” (Doc. 1 at 1–5.) Plaintiff’s complaint purports to allege claims for “rights of a citizen,” “rights of a holy ghost,” and “rights of my own mind and thought.” (Id.) The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.