(PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20241:20-cv-00083California4,405 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIC (AKA DIAMOND) VARGAS, Case No.: 1:20-cv-000083-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR SUBPOENAS
v. (Doc. 65) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND AMENDED ORDER DENYING
REHABILITATION, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 90 DAY
EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR LEAVE
Defendants. TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Doc. 69)
Plaintiff Dominic Vargas is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court issues these amended orders pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,1 and in so doing vacates its previous orders (Doc. 74) issued September 26, 2024. See (Doc. 78.) I. INTRODUCTION On July 8, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Request for Subpoenas. (Doc. 65.) Defendants filed an
1 Rule 60(a) provides, in relevant part: “The court may correct a clerical mistake or a mistake…