(PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20241:20-cv-00083California4,405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIC (AKA DIAMOND) VARGAS, Case No.: 1:20-cv-000083-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR SUBPOENAS

v. (Doc. 65) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND AMENDED ORDER DENYING

REHABILITATION, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 90 DAY

EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR LEAVE

Defendants. TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Doc. 69)

Plaintiff Dominic Vargas is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court issues these amended orders pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,1 and in so doing vacates its previous orders (Doc. 74) issued September 26, 2024. See (Doc. 78.) I. INTRODUCTION On July 8, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Request for Subpoenas. (Doc. 65.) Defendants filed an

1 Rule 60(a) provides, in relevant part: “The court may correct a clerical mistake or a mistake…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.