Biden

(PC) Heizelman v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20241:24-cv-01140California2,850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HEIZELMAN, Case No. 1:24-cv-01140-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN CASE TO A DISTRICT

JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

BIDEN, et al., DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

Defendants. DISMISS CASE AS FRIVOLOUS1

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD (Doc. Nos. 1, 2) 18 Plaintiff Robert Heizelman, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 25, 2024. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). On the same day, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has had at least three actions or appeals that constitute strikes. The undersigned further recommends that instead 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.