Biden
(PC) Heizelman v. Biden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HEIZELMAN, Case No. 1:24-cv-01140-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN CASE TO A DISTRICT
JUDGE
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
BIDEN, et al., DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND
Defendants. DISMISS CASE AS FRIVOLOUS1
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD (Doc. Nos. 1, 2) 18 Plaintiff Robert Heizelman, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 25, 2024. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). On the same day, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has had at least three actions or appeals that constitute strikes. The undersigned further recommends that instead 25 …