Tice-Raskin
(PS) Kopp v. Tice-Raskin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUKE JAMES KOPP, No. 2:23-cv-02631-DAD-SCR (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
S. ROBERT TICE-RASKIN, et al., THIS ACTION WITHOUT LEAVE TO
AMEND
Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 6, 10, 30) 16 Plaintiff Luke James Kopp, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on November 14, 2023. (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 4, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 6, 10) be granted and that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed, without leave to amend, due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. (Doc. No. 30 at 3–4.) In particular, the magistrate judge found that there were “no specific factual allegations” that would show…