(PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIC (AKA DIAMOND) VARGAS, Case No.: 1:20-cv-000083-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER DENYING REQUEST

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (Doc. 64) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Dominic Vargas is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court issues this amended order pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil 21 Procedure,1 and in so doing vacates its previous order (Doc. 75) issued September 26, 2024. See (Doc. 78.) I. INTRODUCTION On June 27, 2024, Plaintiff filed a “Request for Appointment of Legal Counsel.” (Doc. 25 64.)2 Briefly stated, Plaintiff relies on the following circumstances to support his request: (1) “the

1 Rule 60(a) provides, in relevant part: “The court may correct a clerical mistake or a mistake arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part…