Chenalo

(PC) Thomas v. Chenalo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20241:19-cv-01185California1,612 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERT EUGENE THOMAS, No. 1:19-cv-01185-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Docs. 40, 48) SALAS, MEDINA, FLORES, and C/O #

THIRD WATCH,

15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Albert Eugene Thomas proceeds on his prisoner civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Salas, Medina, Flores, and C/O #1 Third Watch. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 9, 2023, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that this action should be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Doc. 40. Plaintiff opposed summary judgment and defendants filed a reply. Docs. 46, 47. On September 27, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted as the record established that plaintiff failed to exhaust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.