Dixon

Dixon v. Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20241:23-cv-00876California332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER DIXON, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00876-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY

v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

FAILURE TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL

OLDCASTLE INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., DOCUMENTS

Defendant. (ECF No. 14)

OCTOBER 25, 2024 DEADLINE On August 16, 2024, a notice of settlement was filed informing the Court that the parties had reached an agreement in principle to settle this action. (ECF No. 13.) On August 19, 2024, the Court ordered that the parties file dispositional documents within sixty (60) days, or no later than October 18, 2024. Dispositional documents were not filed by the ordered deadline. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.