(PC) Baggett v. Division of Adult Parole Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20241:24-cv-00978California649 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY ALBERT BAGGETT, No. 1:24-cv-00978 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

ORDER RECOMMENDING MATTER BE

DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE

CORRECTIONS AND NOTICE OF CURRENT ADDRESS WITH

REHABILITATION, COURT Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE IN

FOURTEEN DAYS

18 Plaintiff, an individual who appears to be a former civil detainee, is proceeding pro se and 19 in forma pauperis in this matter. He has filed it seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 20 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 21 Local Rule 302. 22 For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that this matter be 23 dismissed for failure to file a current address with the Court. Plaintiff will have fourteen days 24 from the date of this order to file objections to it.

I. RELEVANT FACTS

26 On August 5, 2024, Plaintiff’s complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.