(PC) Storm v. CSATF Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIMITRI Z. STORM, Case No. 1:24-cv-01274-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST PRIOR TO FILING

CSATF WARDEN, et al., SUIT Defendants. (ECF No. 1) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff Dimitri Z. Storm (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Prisoners are required to exhaust the available administrative remedies prior to filing suit. …