Rollin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN INDIANA CURRY, No. 2:23-cv-00791-TLN-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. ROLLAND, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court are (1) plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s ruling declining to enter an order compelling defendants to preserve certain video evidence (ECF No. 36) and (2) motions by both plaintiff and defendants to modify the schedule (ECF Nos. 30, 41). For the reasons that follow, the motion for reconsideration is denied and the requests to modify the schedule are granted. I. Background The case proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint. ECF No. 13. In screening that pleading, the court found potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against defendants for housing plaintiff in a building designated for Covid-19 positive inmates even though plaintiff had 27 …