(PC) Smithee v. California Correctional Institution

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA SMITHEE, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00004-JLT-CDB

Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO PAY

SANCTIONS OF $100 PER DAY

v. (Doc. 171) CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et al., 15 Defendants.

On September 16, 2024, Defendant Pratap Narayn (“Defendant”) filed a motion for summary judgment against Plaintiffs Dana Smithee and E.M. (“Plaintiffs”). (Doc. 163). On October 21, 2024, the Court notified Defendant that his summary judgment filings failed to comply with Local Rule 260 and 133. (Doc. 171). Those rules provide in relevant part: 22 Local Rule 260(a): Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication. Each motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication shall be accompanied by a "Statement of Undisputed Facts" that shall enumerate discretely each of the specific material facts relied upon in support of the motion and cite the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other…