Pfeiffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD MEZA, No. 2:20-cv-2316-DAD-CSK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER VACATING COURT’S PRIOR

ORDER, GRANTING PETITIONER’S

v. MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE OBJECTIONS, AND CONSTRUING

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, PETITIONER’S MOTION TO VACATE

JUDGMENT AS OBJECTIONS

Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 53, 54) 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On September 5, 2024, the undersigned adopted the August 13, 2024 findings and recommendations, noting that no objections had been filed. (Doc. No. 52 at 1.) On September 9, 2024, petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file objections. (Doc. No. 53.) The motion was accompanied by a proof of service reflecting petitioner attesting to service of his motion on August 27, 2024. (Id. at 7.) Under the mailbox rule, petitioner’s motion for an extension of time was mailed before the time for the filing of objections had expired, and therefore was timely…