Molina
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Molina
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20241:23-cv-01553California583 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Case No. 1:23-cv-01553-CDB
COMPANY,
ORDER REQUIRING CROSS- Plaintiff, DEFENDANT LUPE C. FLORES TO
SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY
v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE
IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR
CONCEPCION FLORES MOLINA, AT STATUS CONFERENCE
15 Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, (Doc. 49) 16 v. 14-DAY DEADLINE
LUPE C. FLORES,
18 Defendant/Cross-Defendant.
20 On September 5, 2024, the Court issued an order (Doc. 49) denying without prejudice both Cross-Plaintiff Molina’s motion for default judgment (Doc. 42) and Cross-Defendant Lupe Flores’ motion for appointment of guardian ad litem and appointment of counsel (Doc. 48). In its order, the Court set and ordered the parties to appear for a mandatory status conference on October 23, 2024, at 10:00 a.m, and provided the email address for the undersigned’s courtroom deputy for the parties to request and obtain Zoom teleconference connection details. See (Doc. 27 …