Molina

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Molina

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20241:23-cv-01553California583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Case No. 1:23-cv-01553-CDB

COMPANY,

ORDER REQUIRING CROSS- Plaintiff, DEFENDANT LUPE C. FLORES TO

SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY

v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR

CONCEPCION FLORES MOLINA, AT STATUS CONFERENCE

15 Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, (Doc. 49) 16 v. 14-DAY DEADLINE

LUPE C. FLORES,

18 Defendant/Cross-Defendant.

20 On September 5, 2024, the Court issued an order (Doc. 49) denying without prejudice both Cross-Plaintiff Molina’s motion for default judgment (Doc. 42) and Cross-Defendant Lupe Flores’ motion for appointment of guardian ad litem and appointment of counsel (Doc. 48). In its order, the Court set and ordered the parties to appear for a mandatory status conference on October 23, 2024, at 10:00 a.m, and provided the email address for the undersigned’s courtroom deputy for the parties to request and obtain Zoom teleconference connection details. See (Doc. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.