Bungay

(PC) Hunter v. Bungay

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20242:22-cv-02048California264 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON EUGENE HUNTER, No. 2:22-cv-2048 DAD CKD Plaintiff, v. BUNGAY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On September 11, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. In that order, plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The amended complaint was due on October 10, 2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.