(PC) Chandra-Das v. John Doe No. 1

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20241:23-cv-00234California6,495 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 DAMODAR CHANDRA−DAS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00234-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE

v. 13 JOHN DOE NO. 1, et al., AND 14 Defendants.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND

TO DENY MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE

RELIEF AND CONTEMPT OF COURT

18 (ECF Nos. 17, 18, 19)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,

DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 21 Plaintiff Damodar Chandra-Das is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint (SAC) on March 22, 2024 (ECF No. 18), which is now before this Court for screening. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s SAC, and for the reasons described in this order, will recommend that this action be dismissed. In addition, the Court will also recommend that Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 17) and contempt of Court (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.