Acevedo

Acevedo v. Akari

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20241:24-cv-01199California3,330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CESAR ACEVEDO, Case No. 1:24-cv-01199-CDB Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DECLINE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

v. OVER PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS RASEM A. AKARI, et al., (Docs. 1, 6) Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 17 Background On October 4, 2024, Plaintiff Cesar Acevedo filed this case against Defendants Rasem A. Akari, doing business as Mountain View Mart, and Manhal Khalil (“Defendants”). (Doc. 1). Plaintiff’s complaint asserts claims for injunctive relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), violation of California Disabled Persons Act, and related state law causes of action. Id. These claims stem from alleged barriers Plaintiff encountered while visiting a facility owned, operated, or leased by Defendants. Id. at 3. No…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.