Hixon
(PC) Tellez v. Hixon
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDY TELLEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00402 JLT GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, WITH ADDITIONAL
v. FINDINGS K. HIXON, et al., ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
Defendants. COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 11) Rudy Tellez seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights while incarcerated at North Kern State Prison. (See Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge directed Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. 9.) However, the U.S. Postal Service returned the order as “Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Attempted-Not known, Unable to Forward, Inactive.” The magistrate judge observed that Plaintiff is required “to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times.” (Doc. 11 at 2, citing Local Rule 183(b).) More…