Hixon

(PC) Tellez v. Hixon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20241:24-cv-00402California1,040 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDY TELLEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00402 JLT GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, WITH ADDITIONAL

v. FINDINGS K. HIXON, et al., ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

Defendants. COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 11) Rudy Tellez seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights while incarcerated at North Kern State Prison. (See Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge directed Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. 9.) However, the U.S. Postal Service returned the order as “Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Attempted-Not known, Unable to Forward, Inactive.” The magistrate judge observed that Plaintiff is required “to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times.” (Doc. 11 at 2, citing Local Rule 183(b).) More…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.