Riley
Riley v. Acco Engineered Systems
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARL L. RILEY, III, Case No. 1:21-cv-01785-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT1 14 (Doc. No. 40) ACCO ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed June 10, 2024. (Doc. No. 40, “MSJ”). Defendant filed a Reply on June 28, 2024 (Doc. No. 47), and Plaintiff filed an untimely Opposition2 on July 8, 2024 (Doc. No. 50). With leave of the Court, Defendant filed a Sur-Reply on July 23, 2024. (Doc. Nos. 57, 58). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the Court grant Defendant’s MSJ because there is no genuine dispute of material fact that Defendant and its employees did not take any adverse employment action against Plaintiff based on his race, nor did they create a hostile work
1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and…