Hearn

Hearn v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20241:22-cv-00668California9,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MATTHEW ALAN HEARN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00668-CDB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE 11 v. (Docs. 70-71)

12 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

13 Defendants. (Doc. 76)

15 Introduction Plaintiff Matthew Alan Hearn (“Plaintiff”) asserts causes of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against Defendants City of Bakersfield, Christian Walter Hernandez V, Nathan A. Anderberg (collectively “City Defendants”), and S. Jauch, and County of Kern (collectively “County Defendants”), based on Defendants’ alleged actions in connection with a law enforcement encounter between Plaintiff and Defendants and others on September 27, 2020, in Bakersfield, as alleged in the operative First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 32). Plaintiff asserts causes of action for: (1) Battery; (2) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (3) Negligence; (4) California Civil Code § 52.1 (“Bane Act”) – Civil Rights Violations –…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.